The Us Counties With The Highest And Lowest Rates Of Fatal Work Zone Traffic Accidents

The U.S. Counties With the Highest (and Lowest) Rates of Fatal Work Zone Traffic Accidents

If you’re a driver, work zones can be a real inconvenience. One minute you’re cruising along, and the next, you’re stuck in traffic. You might view the reduced speed limits, closed lanes, orange signs, and traffic cones as annoyances delaying your journey, but the fact of the matter is that they are there to keep both you and the road workers safe.

While other vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists are commonly recognized obstacles to watch out for, work zones and the construction workers within are sometimes overlooked. When drivers aren’t taking the necessary level of care while passing through work zones, workers’ lives are needlessly put at risk. As a result, roughly 900 highway maintenance and other construction workers are killed in work zone traffic accidents each year.

Our team at Corradino & Papa has compiled and analyzed data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on work zone traffic accidents over the past ten years. This analysis identifies which counties have had the highest, and lowest, rates of fatal work zone accidents.

The U.S. Counties With the Highest (and Lowest) Rates of Fatal Work Zone Traffic Accidents - New Jersey Construction Accident Attorneys - Infographic

By CorradinoandPapa.com

Where are the most (and fewest) fatal work zone accidents per 100,000 people?

1. Jefferson County, Texas – The county with the highest rate of fatal work zone traffic accidents is Jefferson County, Texas at 14.706 accidents per 100,000 people. The county has a population of 251,601 people and there were 37 work zone fatalities from 2013 to 2022.

2. Bell County, Texas – Next on the list for rate of fatal work zone accidents is Texas’ Bell County with 43 accidents from 2013 to 2022. Adjusted for their population of 387,454, there were 11.096 fatal accidents per 100,000 people during this period.

3. McLennan County, Texas – Rounding out the top three is yet another entry from Texas: McLennan County. From 2013 to 2022, there were 9.768 traffic-related work zone fatalities per 100,000 people. During that time, a total of 26 people died in work zone traffic accidents.

When it comes to counties with the lowest rate of fatal work zone accidents from 2013 to 2022, there are four that can luckily claim no such incidents: Dakota County in Missouri, Dutchess County in New York, Lake County in Ohio, and Whatcom County in Washington.

Fatal Work Zone Accidents in New Jersey

In New Jersey, Salem County is where the highest rate of fatal work zone accidents have taken place over the 10-year period we focused on, 3.070 per 100,000 people. Camden County experienced the highest total number of fatal work zone accidents in the state but due to their significantly larger population, their rate per 100,000 people remained lower at 2.668 per 100,000 people. The following map examines every in New Jersey and gives us some insight into how the state compares to some of the safest and deadliest counties in the country.

New Jersey Fatal Work Zone Traffic Accidents by County

Rank	City	Population (2022)	Drivers in Fatal Accidents With a BAC of 0.08+ (2018-2022)	Drivers in Fatal Accidents With a BAC of 0.15+ (2018-2022)	Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents per 100,000 People
1	Odessa, TX	112,906	31	23	27.46
2	San Bernardino, CA	220,328	40	26	18.15
3	Pueblo, CO	111,456	20	17	17.94
4	Corona, CA	159,567	24	17	15.04
5	Hartford, CT	120,686	18	11	14.91
6	Midland, TX	134,444	19	17	14.13
7	Dallas, TX	1,299,544	181	130	13.93
8	Chattanooga, TN	184,086	25	19	13.58
9	Detroit, MI	620,376	82	59	13.22
10	Charleston, SC	153,672	20	15	13.01
11	Jacksonville, FL	971,319	126	84	12.97
12	Ontario, CA	179,061	22	16	12.29
13	Waterbury, CT	115,016	14	10	12.17
14	Victorville, CA	137,221	16	11	11.66
15	Lansing, MI	112,537	13	8	11.55
16	Houston, TX	2,302,878	258	182	11.20
17	Akron, OH	188,509	21	16	11.14
18	Lubbock, TX	263,930	29	24	10.99
19	Tucson, AZ	546,574	60	43	10.98
20	Temecula, CA	111,752	12	10	10.74
21	Lewisville, TX	131,215	14	8	10.67
22	Greensboro, NC	301,115	32	19	10.63
23	Riverside, CA	320,764	34	18	10.60
24	Colorado Springs, CO	486,248	51	35	10.49
25	Ventura, CA	109,527	11	8	10.04
26	San Antonio, TX	1,472,909	147	116	9.98
27	Glendale, AZ	252,136	25	16	9.92
28	Aurora, CO	393,537	39	31	9.91
28	Moreno Valley, CA	211,924	21	15	9.91
30	Modesto, CA	218,069	21	13	9.63
31	Lakewood, CO	156,120	15	10	9.61
32	Baton Rouge, LA	221,453	21	14	9.48
33	Sacramento, CA	528,001	50	33	9.47
33	Charlotte, NC	897,720	85	56	9.47
35	Fresno, CA	545,567	51	31	9.35
36	Beaumont, TX	112,089	10	7	8.92
37	Vallejo, CA	123,564	11	10	8.90
38	Arlington, TX	394,602	35	25	8.87
39	Louisville, KY	624,444	54	35	8.65
40	Irving, TX	254,715	22	16	8.64
41	Cleveland, OH	361,607	31	20	8.57
42	Kansas City, KS	153,345	13	10	8.48
43	Phoenix, AZ	1,644,409	139	100	8.45
43	Davie, FL	106,513	9	7	8.45
45	Stockton, CA	321,819	27	18	8.39
46	Thornton, CO	143,282	12	8	8.38
47	Billings, MT	119,960	10	7	8.34
48	Kansas City, MO	509,297	42	31	8.25
49	Denver, CO	713,252	57	42	7.99
50	Palmdale, CA	163,463	13	6	7.95
51	Corpus Christi, TX	316,239	25	18	7.91
52	Knoxville, TN	195,889	15	10	7.66
53	Richardson, TX	118,802	9	7	7.58
54	Oceanside, CA	172,199	13	8	7.55
55	Fairfield, CA	119,338	9	5	7.54
56	Tempe, AZ	185,950	14	11	7.53
57	Nashville, TN	683,622	51	39	7.46
58	Bakersfield, CA	410,647	30	17	7.31
59	Hollywood, FL	152,650	11	7	7.21
60	New Haven, CT	138,915	10	6	7.20
61	Everett, WA	111,337	8	4	7.19
62	Lexington, KY	320,347	23	14	7.18
63	Grand Rapids, MI	196,908	14	11	7.11
63	Birmingham, AL	196,910	14	8	7.11
65	Austin, TX	974,447	69	53	7.08
66	Mesa, AZ	512,498	36	22	7.02
67	Richmond, CA	114,301	8	4	7.00
68	Scottsdale, AZ	243,050	17	10	6.99
69	Waco, TX	143,984	10	6	6.95
70	Augusta, GA	202,096	14	12	6.93
71	McAllen, TX	144,579	10	6	6.92
72	Gainesville, FL	145,214	10	6	6.89
73	Jackson, MS	145,995	10	8	6.85
73	Pomona, CA	146,017	10	8	6.85
75	Cincinnati, OH	309,513	21	15	6.78

Avoiding Work Zone Traffic Accidents

As a driver, you should always be sure to give all of your attention to the road and your surroundings; this is especially true when you’re traveling through a work zone. Avoid distractions such as eating, changing the radio station, using your phone, or anything else that may take your attention away from the road; the life of a construction worker may depend on it. Work zones will have changing speed limits and traffic patterns throughout, so be sure to pay attention to signage and the workers who may be guiding you. Maintain a good distance between you and the car ahead of you, so that you have plenty of time if there is a sudden stop. Road workers and construction vehicles may be around or near your lane, so stay aware of their movements at all times. All in all, the most effective measures to avoiding a work zone accident are to have patience, take all necessary precautions, and to stay alert when you are behind the wheel.

Though the best measures to take are preventative, sometimes reality doesn’t work out that way. Even among the safest and most defensive of drivers, unexpected and unavoidable things can happen. New Jersey-based road maintenance and construction workers who are the victims of construction accidents, motor vehicle accidents, or other work accidents—even those resulting in catastrophic injuries—can contact Corradino & Papa today.

The Data

The 25 Counties With the Most Fatal Work Zone Traffic Accidents per 100,000 People

United States Average: 2.366 fatal work zone traffic accidents per 100,000 people

Rank	City	Population (2022)	Drivers in Fatal Accidents With a BAC of 0.08+ (2018-2022)	Drivers in Fatal Accidents With a BAC of 0.15+ (2018-2022)	Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents per 100,000 People
1	Odessa, TX	112,906	31	23	27.46
2	San Bernardino, CA	220,328	40	26	18.15
3	Pueblo, CO	111,456	20	17	17.94
4	Corona, CA	159,567	24	17	15.04
5	Hartford, CT	120,686	18	11	14.91
6	Midland, TX	134,444	19	17	14.13
7	Dallas, TX	1,299,544	181	130	13.93
8	Chattanooga, TN	184,086	25	19	13.58
9	Detroit, MI	620,376	82	59	13.22
10	Charleston, SC	153,672	20	15	13.01
11	Jacksonville, FL	971,319	126	84	12.97
12	Ontario, CA	179,061	22	16	12.29
13	Waterbury, CT	115,016	14	10	12.17
14	Victorville, CA	137,221	16	11	11.66
15	Lansing, MI	112,537	13	8	11.55
16	Houston, TX	2,302,878	258	182	11.20
17	Akron, OH	188,509	21	16	11.14
18	Lubbock, TX	263,930	29	24	10.99
19	Tucson, AZ	546,574	60	43	10.98
20	Temecula, CA	111,752	12	10	10.74
21	Lewisville, TX	131,215	14	8	10.67
22	Greensboro, NC	301,115	32	19	10.63
23	Riverside, CA	320,764	34	18	10.60
24	Colorado Springs, CO	486,248	51	35	10.49
25	Ventura, CA	109,527	11	8	10.04
26	San Antonio, TX	1,472,909	147	116	9.98
27	Glendale, AZ	252,136	25	16	9.92
28	Aurora, CO	393,537	39	31	9.91
28	Moreno Valley, CA	211,924	21	15	9.91
30	Modesto, CA	218,069	21	13	9.63
31	Lakewood, CO	156,120	15	10	9.61
32	Baton Rouge, LA	221,453	21	14	9.48
33	Sacramento, CA	528,001	50	33	9.47
33	Charlotte, NC	897,720	85	56	9.47
35	Fresno, CA	545,567	51	31	9.35
36	Beaumont, TX	112,089	10	7	8.92
37	Vallejo, CA	123,564	11	10	8.90
38	Arlington, TX	394,602	35	25	8.87
39	Louisville, KY	624,444	54	35	8.65
40	Irving, TX	254,715	22	16	8.64
41	Cleveland, OH	361,607	31	20	8.57
42	Kansas City, KS	153,345	13	10	8.48
43	Phoenix, AZ	1,644,409	139	100	8.45
43	Davie, FL	106,513	9	7	8.45
45	Stockton, CA	321,819	27	18	8.39
46	Thornton, CO	143,282	12	8	8.38
47	Billings, MT	119,960	10	7	8.34
48	Kansas City, MO	509,297	42	31	8.25
49	Denver, CO	713,252	57	42	7.99
50	Palmdale, CA	163,463	13	6	7.95
51	Corpus Christi, TX	316,239	25	18	7.91
52	Knoxville, TN	195,889	15	10	7.66
53	Richardson, TX	118,802	9	7	7.58
54	Oceanside, CA	172,199	13	8	7.55
55	Fairfield, CA	119,338	9	5	7.54
56	Tempe, AZ	185,950	14	11	7.53
57	Nashville, TN	683,622	51	39	7.46
58	Bakersfield, CA	410,647	30	17	7.31
59	Hollywood, FL	152,650	11	7	7.21
60	New Haven, CT	138,915	10	6	7.20
61	Everett, WA	111,337	8	4	7.19
62	Lexington, KY	320,347	23	14	7.18
63	Grand Rapids, MI	196,908	14	11	7.11
63	Birmingham, AL	196,910	14	8	7.11
65	Austin, TX	974,447	69	53	7.08
66	Mesa, AZ	512,498	36	22	7.02
67	Richmond, CA	114,301	8	4	7.00
68	Scottsdale, AZ	243,050	17	10	6.99
69	Waco, TX	143,984	10	6	6.95
70	Augusta, GA	202,096	14	12	6.93
71	McAllen, TX	144,579	10	6	6.92
72	Gainesville, FL	145,214	10	6	6.89
73	Jackson, MS	145,995	10	8	6.85
73	Pomona, CA	146,017	10	8	6.85
75	Cincinnati, OH	309,513	21	15	6.78

*St. Louis, Missouri is an independent city that is not a part of a county and is recognized as a county-equivalent by the NHTSA.

The 25 Counties With the Fewest Fatal Work Zone Traffic Accidents per 100,000 People

Rank	City	Population (2022)	Drivers in Fatal Accidents With a BAC of 0.08+ (2018-2022)	Drivers in Fatal Accidents With a BAC of 0.15+ (2018-2022)	Fatal Drunk Driving Accidents per 100,000 People
1	Odessa, TX	112,906	31	23	27.46
2	San Bernardino, CA	220,328	40	26	18.15
3	Pueblo, CO	111,456	20	17	17.94
4	Corona, CA	159,567	24	17	15.04
5	Hartford, CT	120,686	18	11	14.91
6	Midland, TX	134,444	19	17	14.13
7	Dallas, TX	1,299,544	181	130	13.93
8	Chattanooga, TN	184,086	25	19	13.58
9	Detroit, MI	620,376	82	59	13.22
10	Charleston, SC	153,672	20	15	13.01
11	Jacksonville, FL	971,319	126	84	12.97
12	Ontario, CA	179,061	22	16	12.29
13	Waterbury, CT	115,016	14	10	12.17
14	Victorville, CA	137,221	16	11	11.66
15	Lansing, MI	112,537	13	8	11.55
16	Houston, TX	2,302,878	258	182	11.20
17	Akron, OH	188,509	21	16	11.14
18	Lubbock, TX	263,930	29	24	10.99
19	Tucson, AZ	546,574	60	43	10.98
20	Temecula, CA	111,752	12	10	10.74
21	Lewisville, TX	131,215	14	8	10.67
22	Greensboro, NC	301,115	32	19	10.63
23	Riverside, CA	320,764	34	18	10.60
24	Colorado Springs, CO	486,248	51	35	10.49
25	Ventura, CA	109,527	11	8	10.04
26	San Antonio, TX	1,472,909	147	116	9.98
27	Glendale, AZ	252,136	25	16	9.92
28	Aurora, CO	393,537	39	31	9.91
28	Moreno Valley, CA	211,924	21	15	9.91
30	Modesto, CA	218,069	21	13	9.63
31	Lakewood, CO	156,120	15	10	9.61
32	Baton Rouge, LA	221,453	21	14	9.48
33	Sacramento, CA	528,001	50	33	9.47
33	Charlotte, NC	897,720	85	56	9.47
35	Fresno, CA	545,567	51	31	9.35
36	Beaumont, TX	112,089	10	7	8.92
37	Vallejo, CA	123,564	11	10	8.90
38	Arlington, TX	394,602	35	25	8.87
39	Louisville, KY	624,444	54	35	8.65
40	Irving, TX	254,715	22	16	8.64
41	Cleveland, OH	361,607	31	20	8.57
42	Kansas City, KS	153,345	13	10	8.48
43	Phoenix, AZ	1,644,409	139	100	8.45
43	Davie, FL	106,513	9	7	8.45
45	Stockton, CA	321,819	27	18	8.39
46	Thornton, CO	143,282	12	8	8.38
47	Billings, MT	119,960	10	7	8.34
48	Kansas City, MO	509,297	42	31	8.25
49	Denver, CO	713,252	57	42	7.99
50	Palmdale, CA	163,463	13	6	7.95
51	Corpus Christi, TX	316,239	25	18	7.91
52	Knoxville, TN	195,889	15	10	7.66
53	Richardson, TX	118,802	9	7	7.58
54	Oceanside, CA	172,199	13	8	7.55
55	Fairfield, CA	119,338	9	5	7.54
56	Tempe, AZ	185,950	14	11	7.53
57	Nashville, TN	683,622	51	39	7.46
58	Bakersfield, CA	410,647	30	17	7.31
59	Hollywood, FL	152,650	11	7	7.21
60	New Haven, CT	138,915	10	6	7.20
61	Everett, WA	111,337	8	4	7.19
62	Lexington, KY	320,347	23	14	7.18
63	Grand Rapids, MI	196,908	14	11	7.11
63	Birmingham, AL	196,910	14	8	7.11
65	Austin, TX	974,447	69	53	7.08
66	Mesa, AZ	512,498	36	22	7.02
67	Richmond, CA	114,301	8	4	7.00
68	Scottsdale, AZ	243,050	17	10	6.99
69	Waco, TX	143,984	10	6	6.95
70	Augusta, GA	202,096	14	12	6.93
71	McAllen, TX	144,579	10	6	6.92
72	Gainesville, FL	145,214	10	6	6.89
73	Jackson, MS	145,995	10	8	6.85
73	Pomona, CA	146,017	10	8	6.85
75	Cincinnati, OH	309,513	21	15	6.78

Notes:

Work zone traffic fatalities include all traffic-related deaths that occurred within work zones from 2013 through 2022, including those involving road and construction workers, as well as drivers, pedestrians, and others.
Connecticut was excluded from this analysis because the state transitioned from counties to planning regions during the study period, resulting in incomplete data.

Sources:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) (https://www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/fatality-analysis-reporting-system-fars)

U.S. Census Bureau, County Population Totals and Components of Change (2022) (https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-counties-total.html)

The Historical Marker Database, U.S. County Seat List (https://www.hmdb.org/countyoverlay/countyseatlist.asp)

Our Five-Star Reviews

Our Team is Dedicated to You

★★★★★

"I worked with Attorney Tim Fonseca on a slip and fall accident and he was kind, patient, knowledgeable and extremely patient and sympathetic. The entire staff at this firm is top notch. I highly recommend! "

Jennifer M.

Former Client

★★★★★

"I can’t imagine using a different law firm. Angelo and Valentina always made me feel like I was their only case. They helped me understand the complexity of my case, respected my concerns, and provided on-target counsel. Decision making on my part was never difficult due to their attentiveness and support. If you are reading this review, I highly suggest you stop looking at other law firms. You have already found the best in class."

Richard

Former Client

★★★★★

"Communication is key when dealing with something as important as a lawsuit. Another concern is not understanding all of the legal jargon and steps involved in the whole process. Corradino and Papa simplified those steps and communicate clearly, simply and often. They make you feel like family and make sure that you fully understand EVERYTHING about your case. Heidi Carrasco and Robert C. Papa (RC) were amazing and really helped me throughout the whole process. I'm grateful to have been a client and highly recommend them."

William L.

Former Client

★★★★★

"I've had the pleasure to deal with Nick Schroter at Corradino and Papa, LLC since January 2023. He was very knowledgeable and extremely helpful with the process and procedures with the dealings of a motor vehicle accident. He fought for me until I was satisfied with the outcome. Nick was always available and prompt with responses and directions. I highly recommend using Corradino and Papa's law firm for any personal injury case you may have. I would definitely deal with Nick Schroter and Corradino and Papa again. "

Charlene P.

Former Client

★★★★★

"Corradino and Papa did a wonderful job handling my car accident case. My attorney Nicholas Schroter was excellent. He was professional, honest and kind. He always communicated with me and provided guidance during a very difficult time. I highly recommend Corradino and Papa. "

Jackie M.

Former Client

See Our Client Reviews

You Pay Nothing